Web3 Wallet Development Company | Wavect
HomeServicesWeb3 & BlockchainWeb3 Wallet DevelopmentWalletsFrom MetaMask-native smart wallets to onboarding where the user never learns the word wallet. We have shipped both. Cancel any week. Last week. . .
HomeServicesWeb3 & BlockchainWeb3 Wallet DevelopmentWalletsFrom MetaMask-native smart wallets to onboarding where the user never learns the word wallet. We have shipped both. Cancel any week. Last week refunded if we didn't blow you away. No hours tracked. MetaMaskNative smart-wallet integration built against the Snap sandboxSee the case studyInvisibleSocial login and wallet creation on a live marketplace, no crypto jargon shownSee the case study// 01What We DoThe wallet decision determines your conversion rate, your support load, and who is liable when keys are lost. It is worth getting right before you build. Embedded and Invisible WalletsWallet creation behind a social login, for users who are not here for crypto. Social login to wallet in one stepNo seed phrase shown to the userOn-chain primitives behind familiar UXProgressive disclosure for users who want the keysMetaMask SnapsExtend the wallet your users already have instead of shipping a new one. Snap development against the sandboxCustom chains and signing flowsSmart-account features inside MetaMaskPermissions and review-process handlingKey ManagementMPC, smart accounts, or plain EOA, chosen against your actual liability. MPC and threshold-signature architecturesHardware and platform keychain signersCustodial versus non-custodial consequencesKey rotation and recovery designMulti-Chain Wallet ApplicationsFull wallet products across mobile and web. Multi-chain account and balance handlingTransaction simulation before signingToken and NFT display that stays fastMobile and browser-extension deliveryWallet Model SelectionWe will map the options against your users before writing code. EOA, smart account, MPC, embedded, custodialRegulatory consequences of holding keysSupport-load and recovery cost per modelMigration path if you pick wrong// 02How we approach walletsMost wallet projects fail on onboarding, not on cryptography. OnAfomawe layered on-chain primitives behind social login so the user never saw crypto jargon, and the client’s public review notes the speed of delivery. On theMetaMask Snap, with Boba Network’s team, we went the other way and extended the wallet users already trust. Which of those is right depends entirely on who your users are. See alsoaccount abstraction developmentand theWeb3 hub. // 03When you should not build a walletBuilding your own wallet is rarely the right answer. If your users are crypto-native, connect to the wallets they already have and spend the budget on your product instead. If they are not, an embedded wallet from an established provider will usually beat a custom build on both time and risk. Custom wallet work earns its cost when you have an unusual signing model, a chain nobody supports properly, or a UX requirement that off-the-shelf providers cannot meet. Also be honest about custody: the moment you can move user funds, you have taken on a regulatory posture that is expensive to unwind. Need a wallet, or need to avoid building one?Tell us who your users are and what they have to sign. We will map the options honestly, including the ones where you build nothing. // proofProof, not promisesThese are selected projects, not our full portfolio. We have shipped 75+ products since 2018. What clients sayGoogleTHE agency to go for blockchain development. Super experienced and highly professional team. Love to work with them. Richard LeitgebOriginalLinkedInFor technical questions on blockchain and NFT, I always come back to Kevin. He has familiarized himself very well in this area, and the expertise he brings is certainly essential for projects like these. I can only recommend everyone get in touch with Kevin on these topics. Fritz FahringerKlarheit vor KITrustpilotExperts in smart contract development. CJOriginalIndependently rated 4. 5/5 on TrustpilotRead the reviewsFAQsHonest answers about wallet deliveryEnd any week, with one message. No notice period, no exit interview, no fine print. We invoice weekly, so the most you’re ever committed to is the current week. It’s in your contract: tell us, and we refund that week. No questions, no invoices to dispute, no calls to escalate. The only rule: refunds apply to the most recent week. Because hours are the wrong metric. If we’re optimizing for hours billed, we’re not optimizing for your outcome. The deal is simpler: every week, we earn the next one. If we don’t, you don’t pay. We’re free to spend zero hours or sixty. What matters is whether you’re blown away. We work with operators, not lottery winners. If a request would require breaking physics, the law, or a third party’s systems, we say so, and if we can’t align, we walk. The guarantee is mutual: you can fire us any week; we can also fire ourselves. Smart accounts give you programmable rules such as sponsorship, session keys and recovery, at the cost of a deployment per user and chain-by-chain support. MPC splits a key across parties and looks like a normal address to every chain, which is why custodial and enterprise products favour it, but recovery depends on the provider. Embedded wallets are the fastest route for non-crypto users and hand most of the responsibility to a vendor. Most consumer products want embedded plus a smart account underneath; most institutional products want MPC. Yes, and for consumer products they usually should. OnAfomawallet creation happens behind a social login and the user never sees crypto jargon. The trade-off is where recovery authority sits, so that decision has to be explicit and disclosed rather than hidden. Substantially, and it usually converts better too, because there is no install step and no new trust relationship. A Snap extends MetaMask with custom chains, signing flows or smart-account features. The limits are MetaMask’s sandbox and review process, so it fits when your users already have MetaMask and does not fit when you need full control of the interface. Non-custodial unless you have a specific reason and a licence. If you can move user funds you are custodial in substance regardless of how the marketing reads, and that carries regulatory obligations. We default to non-custodial architectures and will tell you plainly when a design has quietly crossed the line. Integrating an existing embedded-wallet provider into a product is typically a few weeks. A MetaMask Snap or a smart-wallet layer on an existing application is larger but bounded. A full multi-chain wallet product with custom key management is infrastructure work, starting around €100k and 3-6 months. We would rather scope you into the smallest of those that actually solves your problem. // More inMore in Web3 & Blockchain// Get to know usGet to know usLong-term relationships over quick wins.